wongie's world has moved to http://wongiesworld.tumblr.com/

wongie's world has now moved to http://wongiesworld.tumblr.com/

Sunday, April 01, 2007

hot guy on tv: jonathan tucker





i've been doing a mini-marathon of the new irish gangster series the black donnellys. though i like the general look and interweaving plotlines of the series, i can't help but feel that most of the donnelly brothers have yet to be fully realized and worth rooting for. honestly, a series about one brother (played by the awesome jonathan tucker) bailing out the major f**k ups of his other siblings is not really a proper show.

but what keeps me watching is jonathan tucker (the deep end, pulse), a somewhat underrated young actor who is really getting the chance to show his chops on this show. what surprised me is that the boy has a crazy body to boot, now i have an even bigger reason to keep watching.


jonathan tucker in his skivves!
[though this sequence is pretty dark (he is getting rid of a body), jonathan's six pack just gets too distracting to watch. then he goes and washes himself down after the deed is done. god, this is like watching 300!]

Labels: , ,

Thursday, February 01, 2007

my eyes! my eyes!: when did harry potter get so hot?


my inbox has been scorching with emails spreading the promotional photo set of daniel radcliffe's new west end play equus (the scary thing is you can't help but feel a little bit peedo looking at the photos, but then again you can't deny that the boy is looking good).

co-starring richard griffiths (the history boys), this production marks the first major revival of the controversial play in 30 years and features a nude daniel in one dramatic scene. will it be any good? with all this hype around daniel's nudity, what do you think? perhaps they will prove me wrong (post performances comments welcome)

[thanks to mugglenet]

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, January 06, 2007

love connection: the subconscious rules of mating

want to know the difference between wanting to shag a guy or actually date/marry him? turns out it's all in the physical traits of a man.
according to some new studies explained on yahoo, men with more angular masculine traits are considered (by those looking) as really great candidates for short term flings. but subconsciously, they think that these men will also turn out to be bad fathers, most likely to cheat and combatitive in the workplace. those who have more feminine and rounder features are deemed to be keepers for the long haul.

whether that's true or not, the ironic thing is that i'd totally shag angular clooney, but wouldn't mind dating the rounder version of him. ah heck, it's george clooney, who am i kidding? i'll take whatever of his i can get!

Labels: , ,